Tag Archives: D&D

Articles, Editorial

Black Sword Hack and the evolving OSR

4 Comments

The Old School Renaissance is a microcosm within the RPG world. Although many (including myself) refer to the OSR as a whole, cohesive thing, the reality is that the movement is more the result of at least half a dozen origins that random-walked into game preferences which, to an outsider, look similar. The broad preference towards the genre establishment of Dungeons and Dragons (or at least Appendix N, if not the system itself) bounds the definitions we work with; other retroclones and revivals like Cepheus and RuneQuest aren’t included, even if they too are ‘old school’. No, the main thing that all vectors of the OSR have in common is that they are trying to recreate the time when the roleplaying game was new. And when RPGs were new, either literally or in the eyes of the designer, the new thing that they first touched was (almost always) D&D.

All OSR games are aiming for either D&D as it was, D&D as it could be, or D&D as it was supposed to be. D&D as it was is simple; Old School Essentials is a straight-up retroclone and proves that ‘Basic D&D without shitty layout and shitty editing’ is a winning recipe. It’s the best known and best selling retroclone, but the retroclone camp of the OSR is arguably the oldest (to the degree that OSR is a label we can trace it back to OSRIC). D&D as it could be is where we start getting a lot of the distillations; the rules in early editions were such a mess you barely used any of them, so clearly one could write a game only using those few rules we could actually make work. This is where Into the Odd comes in, this is arguably where The Black Hack comes in, and, if rules were in any way supposed to be primary in the game, this might be where Mork Borg would come in. This example shows setting and tone are a different topic here than ‘game’. D&D as it was supposed to be is a tough one, and there aren’t many games that really aim for this mark. Whitehack is the one that comes to mind for me, taking the length and complexity of the original booklets and turning that into something much more flexible and consistent.

Continue reading Black Sword Hack and the evolving OSR →
Articles, Editorial

Daggerheart Preview

14 Comments

Earlier this month, Darrington Press released the free playtest version of Daggerheart, their traditional fantasy RPG meant to go toe-to-toe with D&D. First with Pathfinder but now also with entries from MCDM and Kobold Press, we’re getting an awful lot of D&D-alikes, thanks to last year’s saga with the OGL. It’s now clear that a corporate game is a liability, so anyone making a livelihood in the gaming space is clearing out of the Halls of Hasbro. What makes Daggerheart, the entry from the Critical Role folks so special? I downloaded it for free, for one thing. In all seriousness Daggerheart is entering the public eye a little earlier than the MCDM RPG or Tales of the Valiant, both of which are currently fulfilling crowdfunding and doing any additional playtesting either contained to backers or within their own teams. The public playtest process is a great way to get a lot of feedback, and it’s worked well in the past; both 5e and the second edition of Pathfinder went through public playtesting.

It’s also caused some grief already. Darrington is somewhat in the crosshairs, between the moderate reception to their first game Candela Obscura and the relatively polarized fanbase that Critical Role has created by being the biggest voice in the room. Seems like a perfect time for someone like me to come in. I’m not the most impartial judge, given my growing disinterest in D&D or its cousins over the last five years, but I do understand what these games are trying to do. To that end, Daggerheart seems to have what it takes to grow a fanbase. It just needs to solve a few niggling issues with its own relationship to narrative mechanics first.

Continue reading Daggerheart Preview →
Articles, Editorial

What can we say about RPGs?

1 Comment

This is my eighth year of writing for Cannibal Halfling Gaming. On one hand, everything I’ve done here has blown up beyond my wildest expectations; the quantity, quality, and audience of my writing are all better than I could have imagined back in 2016 when I asked Seamus to join his project. At the same time, though, the journey often comes with the feeling that we still aren’t doing anything of the scale or ambition to be worthwhile. Some of this is just imposter syndrome, to be clear. Some of it, though, is borne from frustrations that come with being a content creator for a niche hobby and insisting on using the written word to do it.

As Seamus spoke about recently in The Trouble With Reviewing RPGs, there are limits to what we can do on our budget of approximately nothing; we both have full-time jobs and writing for a site like this must be fun and/or fulfilling even before it is useful if we’re to continue doing it. At the same time, there are things we have to say, and having no budget also means we aren’t beholden to anyone. Things are changing, though; we’re changing. When I wrote that very first article about PbtA I was 29 years old; I’m 36 now. That is a huge step away from the core audience of tabletop RPGs, and as our entire millennial generation now sits above the first standard deviation of age for a gamer we need to think long and hard about our continued relevance (or inevitable descent into grognardism).

Continue reading What can we say about RPGs? →